- Joined
- May 21, 2011
- Messages
- 25,252
- Reaction score
- 699
- Points
- 118
- Age
- 45
- Favorite Wrestler
-
- Favorite Wrestler
-
- Favorite Wrestler
-
- Favorite Wrestler
-
So I've been toying with this idea for awhile and felt that this was the perfect time to get it off the ground. Basically what happens here is that I'll post a controversial statement to start us off and, provided you disagree with it, your job is to argue against it. This isn't a situation where there will be a winner or loser so much as one where you can all try and come together to look at the positive side of things. In a day and age where everyone is constantly griping about the product, perhaps this will be a breath of fresh air. Keep in mind, the statement I make each week is not necessarily my opinion, simply one that I feel will get your attention. So with that being said, here's this week's statement....
"Outside of his in-ring skills (selling, psychology, moveset), I really don't understand what the big deal about Dolph Ziggler is. I feel his mic work is simplistic and that he wouldn't be my first choice to hold a major title in WWE. What does this guy really have going for him (besides ring-work) that makes him a great PRO wrestler?"
Ready...set...go!
"Outside of his in-ring skills (selling, psychology, moveset), I really don't understand what the big deal about Dolph Ziggler is. I feel his mic work is simplistic and that he wouldn't be my first choice to hold a major title in WWE. What does this guy really have going for him (besides ring-work) that makes him a great PRO wrestler?"
Ready...set...go!