• Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Brock's WM30 Plans Changing?

SAIYANS

Well-Known Member
- We noted on Sunday that there were major WrestleMania XXX creative meetings held this past week and the only thing now considered a lock is Bray Wyatt vs. John Cena. There has been a lot of back and forth discussion over Brock Lesnar's WrestleMania XXX role. The original plan was for Lesnar to face The Undertaker, as noted. That may or may not be the plan still but there could be something to Batista vs. Lesnar being teased on RAW last week.

Source: PWInsider

The pwtorch broadcast also said they heard about the change but it is occurring because Brock is unwilling to go to Texas and practice a match with Taker off screen like his past opponents have done.

So does that mean we get Taker vs Sting or Taker v Orton?
 

Tapout

Well-Known Member
Brock vs. Batista is another good option for both ONLY if the title is as far away from it as possible. Bryan needs to be in the title match. And they're plenty of superstars that can take on Undertaker right now. Orton is a good one for the "rematch." Sheamus would be a good choice. They could go the Rookie trying to make a name route with Roman. If Bryans not in the title match then Bryan vs. Taker would be very good as well.
 

SAIYANS

Well-Known Member
Not really shocked Brock isn't planning on working out the match for a couple weeks before it airs. If they paid him sure, but he ain't doing it out the goodness of his heart. They could also do the triple threat of Brock v Randy v Batista (wish it was a 4 way with Cena) for the title
 

Tapout

Well-Known Member
I've never been a fan of Triple Threat, or even Fatal Four way matches for the title at Mania. Any other time and I'm okay but it just doesn't feel right if its on the Biggest Show of the Year.

And if Brock isn't willing to work the match out with Taker then I fear he wouldn't even alter is ring style to protect Undertaker either. Just seems like a volatile situation there. I want Taker healthy in the Dallas Superdome for 32 to take on Cena for 25-0
 

Schmidty

Active Member
I've never been a fan of Triple Threat, or even Fatal Four way matches for the title at Mania. Any other time and I'm okay but it just doesn't feel right if its on the Biggest Show of the Year.

And if Brock isn't willing to work the match out with Taker then I fear he wouldn't even alter is ring style to protect Undertaker either. Just seems like a volatile situation there. I want Taker healthy in the Dallas Superdome for 32 to take on Cena for 25-0

I don't know, WM 24 Triple H vs Randy Orton vs John Cena was a great match. With some great spots. I'd honestly like to see Bryan vs Orton vs Batista and then Sheamus vs Undertaker and then have the Shield go the Legacy route with a triple threat for the US title.
 

Chris

Dreams are Endless
Yeah, if Brock's gonna be a dick about it and not try and make the match as best as possible then he shouldn't get it even though that's one of the only rumored matches I actually wanted.

Fuck it, I don't even know what I want at 'Mania anymore.
 

BB

Guest
I get the feeling that if, and it's a big if, Sting does sign a contract with the WWE he will face Undertaker at WrestleMania 30. I don't see the point in having Brock Lesnar vs Undertaker when Lesnar could be involved in another program with someone else. I think that he will face Mark Henry at 'Mania or possibly be involved in a triple threat match including the Big Show. 'Taker just seems to get better with age so I wouldn't imagine he is too bothered about facing Lesnar however, it would have to be a stipulation match.
 

Chris

Dreams are Endless
What would be the point of Lesnar/Henry? I get the revenge factor but Brock KILLED him on Raw when both were healthy, no way you can make that believable.
 

SAIYANS

Well-Known Member
I'm not even sure how Brock v Rock would've worked if Brock isn't willing to plan it out beforehand off the books.
 

Dale

Super Moderator
I'm not even sure how Brock v Rock would've worked if Brock isn't willing to plan it out beforehand off the books.
Dunno what Brock's relationship with The Undertaker is like but i'm pretty sure he's more than cool with The Rock so I don't think him meeting up with him would be out of the realms of possibility. I can believe the idea of Brock not wanting to travel to do a tryout match given how he literally opened up a gym in his backyard to train out of for his UFC run.

Outside of Brock I can't really think of anyone unless they really wanted to give Reigns a rub and have him face Taker. Orton/Taker would be one of my favourite choices but that won't work due to him holding the title. Sting/Taker I think would be too rushed this year and should be set up for the year after, have Sting appear after the match or something and then set the match up for next Mania on RAW the night after like they did with Rock/Cena.
 

Deezy

DZ PZ
Sounds like bullshit to me, Undertaker is a great worker and doesn't need to pre plan his matches, Brock was under the learning tree of Finlay and Benoit during his young days, so he knows how to call it in the ring. Great workers don't need pre-planned spots, they call it on the fly, just give them the finish and they figure out the rest. That's the beauty of pro-wrestling and only marks seem to not know what actual professional wrestling is.

Undertaker needs to go over his matches......PFFFFT.
 
Top