wouldn't going winless be more advantageous?This is the week we win one! I hope.... for fuck sake let's win one god damn game!
It would be, and tbh I don't care what we do as long as we re-sign nicks. I'm pretty sure they will if he stays healthy. We were supposed to be building for an impressive aerial attack with eli,cruz,randall, and nicks. This season might have thwarted the plans though.wouldn't going winless be more advantageous?
fun slate of games on paper
It's almost a given that we would draft clowney. Reese (our gm) is all about drafting lineman. I don't see bridewater happening.Not really. Whether the Giants go 3-13 and get the #3 or 0-16 with the #1, they'll get Clowney or that one lineman from Bama or whoever they want
There are some weird rumors going around to trade ELI, and draft bridewater.
No, he won't. I wouldn't doubt if we didn't even consider it. The MO with reese is drafting a lineman, and clowney could be what we need to help our non-existant pass rush. We need to cut emotional ties with vets like webster/tuck/diehl and move on. I get it, you helped us win two rings, but ya gotta go. All are free agents after this year, and I think we are making Nicks our free agent priority. It was almost reconfirmed for me this week when we said we're not trading nicks.Can you really see Jerry Reese doing that though? That's gotta be the most un-Giants move ever. For your love of linemen, anyone who drafts ahead of you needs a QB and there's plenty available.
But if you get Clowney (playing well in this game I'm watching) and JPP plays as well as he can, that's just unfair. But it won't matter with that o-line.
Probably, Jared Allen might get 7 sacks, no lie.Vikings win by 10 :jeritroll:
Watch out for Rg3 this week. I think they are about to open up the playbook for him finally.Both the Packers and Bears have easy opponents this week :downer: