Official AEW Rankings Thread

[Hidden Blaze]

Use this to post the updated rankings every week

 

[Canadian Dragon]

Tweet won't load 4 me so in case here's another

 

[Hidden Blaze]

Damn. Yeah idk what happened to the tweet. It’s gone

 

[Canadian Dragon]

Mox sneaking

 

[Canadian Dragon]

Damn. Yeah idk what happened to the tweet. It’s gone

It think mb twitter linking is having issues. Might b twitter itself

 

[Hidden Blaze]

It think mb twitter linking is having issues. Might b twitter itself

Nah. AEW deleted and Tony tweeted it.

 

[Daddy Deville]

Are Dark Order relevant again?

 

[Deadd2009]

So is Purrazzo #1 contender to both womens titles? The TBS title? Like, make it more clearer, lol.

 

[Wiseman]

So is Purrazzo #1 contender to both womens titles? The TBS title? Like, make it more clearer, lol.

This, I already don't like it cause shit is unclear. IMO, either make the "divisions" for the titles clear or honestly I just don't see it as a necessary thing. Is it just to cater to the fans that wanted it back. I don't understand why.

 

[Hidden Blaze]

I think the higher up you are, the higher title you can claim. Like Copeland being 3rd, he be number 1 for the TNT. Moxley just behind him. Roddy #1 for the International. That kinda falls apart there because then there’s no one to be there for Eddie’s lol.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

This, I already don't like it cause shit is unclear. IMO, either make the "divisions" for the titles clear or honestly I just don't see it as a necessary thing. Is it just to cater to the fans that wanted it back. I don't understand why.

I'm catered to

 

[Chris]

I see them as a P4P list not division rankings, you don't want to lock certain people to divisions.

But with 4 mens titles, we should probably have a top 10 for those rankings at least instead of just 5 lmao

 

[Canadian Dragon]

I see them as a P4P list not division rankings, you don't want to lock certain people to divisions.

But with 4 mens titles, we should probably have a top 10 for those rankings at least instead of just 5 lmao

good point on maybe a longer list with the men. 4 mens singles belt is indeed a lot - its like the one argument I like for a brand split

 

[Bad News Booty]

Man people will complain about anything

 

[Cwalker]

When I first opened this, I was a little confused too on whether or not the men’s rankings were strictly for the World title or all the titles.

Not really a complaint. Just some confusion